The have to be paid by all those that wish to watch iPlayer and/or stay tv, whatever the channel, however not everyone seems to be joyful to take action.
In keeping with a survey from Prepared Regular Reduce, solely 31 p.c of respondents supplied optimistic remarks almost about the TV licence.
The detrimental sentiments expressed counsel a deep-seated dissatisfaction with the present price, with some viewing it as an pointless burden throughout instances of financial hardship.
Many respondents stated they have been “indignant” about paying the price, describing it as a “tax”, a “rip off”, and a “waste of cash”.
One stated: “I really feel the is dumbing down an excessive amount of. I see way more cooking programmes than wanted, too many so-called celebrities and repeats.
:
“They could as effectively have promoting because the breaks between programmes are usually all the time stuffed with trailers for iPlayer and the like. These are issues I can’t stand.”
Some took subject with the 2020 change which noticed a free TV licence solely apply to over 75s on Pension Credit score when beforehand it was out there to all around the age of 75.
Free TV licences for over 75s have been funded by the Authorities, however following a pubic session the Board determined to make the change because the “fairest choice to assist the poorest pensioners”.
One viewer wrote: “I’m pissed off. My mom was pressured to pay for her licence although she is 82, and there’s been nothing on since.”
Equally, one other stated: “It’s disgraceful. As a pensioner with a disabled husband, it was free. Both it ought to be free as earlier than or lowered.”
Others urged there ought to be reform to alter the present strategy to the price or to the company as a complete.
An unnamed respondent stated: “I pay for Sky too, so I really feel I shouldn’t must pay individually for the TV License. It ought to be included along with your subscription value.”
Not everybody, nevertheless, was towards the TV licence, with the survey garnering some optimistic feedback in the case of the price.
Do not miss... [UPDATE]
Some urged the ad-free service is sweet, whereas others valued the ’s function as a supplier of strong content material.
One individual stated: “The does a terrific job. With out it, I can see the media going the identical means because the US which I don’t consider can be good for British society as a complete.
“I really feel larger ranges of subscription use result in a extra myopic view in society, drifting to extremes.”
One other individual defined they're joyful to pay the price, including they'd accomplish that to “have a channel that isn't beholden to advertisers or homeowners”.
A viewer said: “I’m actually joyful to pay for my TV licence, it’s such good worth! Not simply TV of the very best high quality, additionally radio, the web site, and the miracle that's iPlayer.”
Certainly, there have been additionally some people who have been impartial on the matter - 12 p.c in whole.
Some referred to the price as merely a authorized requirement, whereas others have been joyful to pay as it's “what they've all the time executed”.
Others have determined to ditch the TV licence, not as a consequence of their disagreement with the price, however merely because of the evolution of streaming companies equivalent to and Amazon Prime.
These companies don't require the TV licence to be paid, so long as Britons are solely watching by means of these platforms and never viewing stay tv.
has contacted TV Licensing asking for remark.