The New York Occasions Journal investigative reporter and Howard College Knight chair in race and journalism can be acknowledged on the awards telecast Feb. 26 on BET.

Nikole Hannah-Jones has turn out to be probably the most recognizable journalists within the nation. The New York Occasions Journal investigative reporter received a Pulitzer in 2020 for her magnum opus The 1619 Challenge, which reframed the American story within the context of slavery’s ramifications and the continuing contributions of Black People in shaping the nation. The groundbreaking piece was celebrated and led to a cope with Lionsgate, the Occasions and Oprah Winfrey to provide a plethora of tasks based mostly on 1619 (together with an upcoming Hulu docuseries); the most recent installment is the anthology guide The 1619 Challenge: A New Origin Story, printed in November. It additionally sparked a reactionary motion to ban literature that examines historical past and society by way of a racial lens — proof of its affect, as is the response from People who've embraced its revelatory energy. Hannah-Jones — who final summer time joined Howard College as Knight chair in race and journalism and to discovered its Heart for Journalism and Democracy — is receiving the Social Justice Affect Award at this 12 months’s NAACP Picture Awards, airing Feb. 26 on BET.
What are a number of the greatest impacts individuals have shared with you on account of studying The 1619 Challenge?
Black schoolchildren have shared that it has given them a way of pleasure, that they lastly see themselves as actors within the American story. I've heard from numerous readers who stated it modified the way in which they see their nation. That they realized how a lot they by no means knew, how a lot they had been by no means taught and that the nation makes extra sense after having learn it. Then, clearly, there’s the affect that it has on plenty of conservative politicians who're very upset and attempting to ban it from being taught to schoolchildren.
What are opponents of vital race principle misunderstanding or misrepresenting concerning the idea?
What conservatives are doing is utilizing vital race principle as buzzwords of a propaganda marketing campaign. These anti-CRT legal guidelines are anti-history legal guidelines. They’re reminiscence legal guidelines. The truth that any of us exterior of academia or exterior of these whose work facilities on race are speaking about it speaks to the success of that marketing campaign. Important race principle is about attempting to grasp why, 60 years exterior of the civil rights motion, Black People nonetheless fall on the backside of each indicator of well-being in our society. It has nothing to do with making white youngsters really feel like victims. It’s truly not involved with people. It’s about programs. I don’t suppose the query may even be requested, “What are conservatives getting flawed?” They’re deliberately being deceptive. There’s nothing recognizable to vital race principle the way in which that they’re describing it or utilizing it in legal guidelines which can be in search of to ban it.
In your speech at THR‘s Girls in Leisure occasion in December, you referenced “sounding the alarm concerning the harmful second that we're all in.” What can the media and leisure industries do to reply to the censorship tried in lecture rooms?
One, cease legitimizing it. For those who take a look at the protection, it was taking what Republicans had been saying at face worth, which isn't what reporters ought to do. Reporters needs to be skeptical. This was a political technique with a propaganda technique and will have been coated as such. Frankly, plenty of journalists and free speech teams had been silent final 12 months as a result of they had been solely in search of to ban The 1619 Challenge. I stated then that it was by no means going to cease at simply The 1619 Challenge. So now, after all, now we have the sweeping bans which can be attempting to ban texts that deal honestly with the historical past of race and racism, that characteristic queer characters, that discuss concerning the Holocaust in ways in which some individuals don’t like. This was very predictable. We now have been treating politicians utilizing the ability of the state to ban the instructing of concepts the identical as some highschool trainer who does a foul racism lesson, and we legitimized what’s taking place. We’re simply at the start. You solely have to take a look at what Gov. [Ron] DeSantis is attempting to do in Florida together with his invoice, which has gone from being about Okay-to-12 to now telling non-public companies what forms of coaching they will have. That's going to have an effect on all of us. It's a signal of a deeply unhealthy nation when state legislatures begin banning concepts, and that’s the place we're proper now.
Interview edited for size and readability.
This story first appeared within the Feb. 23 difficulty of The Hollywood Reporter journal. Click on right here to subscribe.