Anna Duggar Breaks Silence After Josh’s Child Porn Conviction: ‘There’s More To The Story’ 

Anna Duggar launched a cryptic message on Thursday that appeared to defend her husband after he was discovered responsible in a toddler pornography case.

Anna Duggar has damaged her silence about her husband Josh Duggar‘s baby porn conviction. “There may be extra to the story,” Anna wrote in a message shared to her Instagram and Twitter pages on Feb. 3, her first time talking out since her husband was discovered responsible in December 2021 (and since she gave beginning to her seventh baby in November).

Anna additionally wrote instructed customers within the put up to “see hyperlink in bio” which result in courtroom paperwork that confirmed Josh’s protection workforce submitting a movement for an acquittal — the small print of which we reported on final month.

Anna has stood by her husband since he was placed on trial, accompanying him for on daily basis of his trial final December and, with this newest put up, seeming to co-sign his protection’s argument that another person was behind the horrific pictures of kids being sexually abused that was discovered on his laptop.

“Defendant Joshua Duggar, by and thru undersigned counsel, respectfully strikes this Court docket to enter a judgment of acquittal,” the paperwork which had been initially obtained by HollywoodLife on Jan. 20 learn. The papers listed 4 explanation why the previous 19 Children & Counting star is owed an acquittal together with “failing to well timed disclose exculpatory proof,” “successfully precluded from calling a vital witness, Caleb Williams,” “failing to show over reveals created by the Authorities’s professional witness, James Fottrell upfront of trial” and that Fottrell was “permitted to testify about geolocation” regardless of the very fact regardless of being “unqualified” to take action.

Josh Duggar
Josh Duggar (Uncredited/AP/Shutterstock).

 Duggar’s authorized workforce appears to really feel that the proof doesn’t undeniably show that he’s responsible of what he has been convicted of. “the proof elicited at trial doesn't help a conviction on both depend,” these counts being possessing and receiving the supplies. Largely, the protection feels that the proof didn't show that Duggar was conscious that the “visible depictions had been of a minor participating in sexually specific conduct.”

The doc additionally lists Caleb Williams, an ex-employee, as “a person who had entry to the automobile lot and the HP desktop laptop throughout sure related time durations.” They add that “legislation enforcement had didn't meaningfully examine the likelihood that anybody aside from Duggar could have dedicated the crimes charged,” which means that they really feel Caleb Williams ought to be tried.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post